Dear Editor-in-Chief, We thank the authors Sabour and Shokri for their interest in our recently published paper [1]. We acknowledge that the issues they raised are of potential concern, therefore we hope we can clarify some of the points they addressed. Firstly, we...
Dear Editor, We were interested to read an article that recently published by Barchetti G in the Mar 2019 issue of the Eur Radiol [1]. The authors aimed to evaluate accuracy and inter-observer variability using Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for...
Dear Editor, We would like to thank Rulach et al for their useful comments. It is certainly very interesting to note the different rate of second look PET in our experience (7%) and the West of Scotland data (20.9%). We would agree with regard to the potential...
Dear Prof Menu, We read with interest the work of Prestwich et al on the use of FDG PET-CT scans for response assessment of head and neck squamous cell cancers (SCC) [1]. We agree with their conclusions that second look PET-CTs can spare unnecessary neck dissections....
Dear Editor, We would like to thank Dr. Menu for the opportunity to respond to some interesting comments made in the letter by Dr. Sbeit and his colleagues with regards to our manuscript entitled “Added value of apparent diffusion coefficient distinguishing between...
Dear Editor, We read with interest the article by Pallavi Pandey et al entitled ” Added value of apparent diffusion coefficient distinguishing between serous and mucin-producing pancreatic cyst neoplasms” [1]. We congratulate them for their contribution to...
