Opinions Archives - Page 14 of 25

Letter to the Editor: “Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018–based classification of liver lesions?”

Mar 25, 2020

Dear Editor, We read with great interest the article by Stocker and colleagues in the recent issue of European Radiology about diagnostic accuracy of LI-RADS v2018-based categorization of focal liver lesions using quantitative MRI assessment of arterial phase...

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: “Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis”

Feb 15, 2020

Dear Editor, With great interest we have read the “Letter to the Editor” by Yueqiang Zhu et al. regarding our earlier meta-analysis [1]. We appreciate the feedback given by the authors on minor inconsistencies in data-extraction, as provided in the Erratum to our...

Letter to the Editor: “Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis”

Feb 15, 2020

Dear Editor, We read with considerable interest Dr. Uhlig and colleagues’ article “Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis” published in the March 2019 issue of European Radiology [1]. The authors...

High resolution diffusion weighted-magnetic resonance imaging for risk stratification in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia

Jan 22, 2020

Dear Editor, We would like to raise attention to the potential need for a revisit of suggested imaging protocols for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) in light of the progress in abdominal MRI techniques exemplified a poignant case from our specialist...

Letter to the Editor: “Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors”

Jan 22, 2020

Dear Editor, We have read with great interest the article entitled “Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors”...

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: “Ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules based on the degree of hypoechogenicity and echotexture”

Jan 22, 2020

Dear Editor, We would like to thank Dr. Rueda et al. for their interest in our recent study. Our study validated the feasibility of using adjusted definitions for echogenicity and mixed echogenicity which are differently used in various risk stratification systems. We...

Opinions

Letter to the Editor: “Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018–based classification of liver lesions?”

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: “Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis”

Letter to the Editor: “Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis”

High resolution diffusion weighted-magnetic resonance imaging for risk stratification in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia

Letter to the Editor: “Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors”

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: “Ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules based on the degree of hypoechogenicity and echotexture”

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives