Dear Editor in Chief,<\/p>\n
We would like to share ideas on \u201cCardiac magnetic resonance imaging of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination: a multicenter collection of 27 cases” [1].<\/p>\n
Di Dedda et al. concluded that \u201cWhile establishing a causal relationship between peri-myocardial inflammation and vaccine administration can be challenging, our clinical experience suggests that CMR should be performed for diagnosis confirmation and to drive clinical decision-making and follow-up” [1]. We agree that CMR is useful for diagnosis of cardiac problem. In studied cases, the vaccine recipients had cardiac problem but the problem might or might not be associated with COVID-19 vaccine. The CMR can diagnose cardiac pathological change but it cannot diagnose the cause. There is usually no data on previous vaccination cardiac status of the vaccine recipient [2]. Also, the concurrent medical problem might co-occur. For example, dengue might co-occur and cause cardiac problem in a COVID-19 vaccine recipient [2, 3].<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Dear Editor in Chief, We would like to share ideas on \u201cCardiac magnetic resonance imaging of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination: a multicenter collection of 27 cases” [1]. Di Dedda et al. concluded that \u201cWhile establishing a causal relationship between peri-myocardial inflammation and vaccine administration can be challenging, our clinical experience suggests that CMR […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinions"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n